skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Gates, Evan"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Abstract Fӧrster (or fluorescence) resonance energy transfer (FRET) is a quantifiable energy transfer in which a donor fluorophore nonradiatively transfers its excitation energy to an acceptor fluorophore. A change in FRET efficiency indicates a change of proximity and environment of these fluorophores, which enables the study of intermolecular interactions. Measurement of FRET efficiency using the sensitized emission method requires a donor–acceptor calibrated system. One of these calibration factors named theGfactor, which depends on instrument parameters related to the donor and acceptor measurement channels and on the fluorophores quantum efficiencies, can be determined in several different ways and allows for conversion of the raw donor and acceptor emission signals to FRET efficiency. However, the calculated value of the G factor from experimental data can fluctuate significantly depending on the chosen experimental method and the size of the sample. In this technical note, we extend the results of Gates et al. (Cytometry Part A 95A (2018) 201–213) by refining the calibration method used for calibration of FRET from image pixel data. Instead of using the pixel histograms of two constructs with high and low FRET efficiency to determine theGfactor, we use pixel histogram data from one construct of known efficiency. We validate this method by determining theGfactor with the same constructs developed and used by Gates et al. and comparing the results from the two approaches. While the two approaches are equivalent theoretically, we demonstrate that the use of a single construct with known efficiency provides a more precise experimental measurement of theGfactor that can be attained by collecting a smaller number of images. © 2020 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry 
    more » « less